USDA sides with corporate profits over public safety

You may have heard me once or twice (possibly) mention that just maybe the FDA kowtows just a tad to Big Pharma.

But now the guys at the FDA look like complete amateurs compared to the pros at the USDA.

USDA officials recently decided to do something so completely and brazenly pro-giant-corporation and anti-organic-farmer, that it's almost like they're taunting us.

Little monsters

If you know anything about the USDA, you know that anytime they bend over backwards to accommodate the needs of a large corporation, it will almost always involve the biotech giant Monsanto -- the corporate powerhouse that is to agriculture what The Real Housewives of New Jersey are to decorum and good taste.

If you're unfamiliar with how Monsanto does business, let me give you an example that illustrates what passes for integrity in their dirty little billionaires club.

Monsanto owns patents on several types of GM seeds known as Roundup Ready. These seeds grow crops (corn, sugar beets, alfalfa, etc.) that holdup to constant drenching with the weed killer Roundup, which happens to be made by -- let's see if you can guess. Ding, ding, ding...you guessed right -- it's Monsanto.

But if Monsanto's specially modified seeds should drift into a neighboring field, patent law allows the company to sue the owner of that field. And that's exactly what Monsanto has done on several occasions.

So if you've got an organic farm and their GM seeds cross-pollinate and contaminate YOUR crops, Monsanto can sue you (as if you somehow stole the contamination from them).

What words come to mind here? Predatory weasels? Malignant bottom-feeders? Merciless cut-throats? All of the above?

And the USDA? They're like Monsanto's little doofus sidekick, with just enough power to be dangerous.

Handing over the keys

To really get a handle on this new USDA/Monsanto idiot outrage, we need to jump back for a moment to 2005. That was the year the USDA approved Monsanto's Roundup Ready GM sugar beet seeds without an environmental impact study.

Sure! Free pass! Go right ahead.

In 2009, a federal judge realized the problems with the approval process and ruled that it was illegal. No kidding -- this only took FOUR YEARS! Then last year, the same judge upheld his ruling and found the USDA to be in violation of the National Environmental Policy Act.

Okay, then! Finally, it was time to subject those GM seeds to a rigorous safety study!

So the USDA got tough, and the study got underway. But then, like easily distracted children, the agency got tired of playing that game.

In February of this year, USDA officials announced that farmers could go ahead and plant the Monsanto GM sugar beet seeds before the impact study was completed. The reasoning: The agency was concerned that the ban would prompt a rise in sweetener prices.

Unbelievable! And yet, all too believable. Only in the U.S. regulatory system would market prices be considered more important than environmental and consumer safety.

But wait -- THAT'S not the extent of the outrage...

Just a few weeks ago, the USDA finally came up with a plan that at least made it SEEM like they were giving in to the demands of the federal judge.

They announced a two-year "pilot project" for environmental impact studies...with just one little wrinkle...

USDA officials seem to think it will be a really efficient idea to allow what they call "industry" (in other words, "Monsanto") to conduct THEIR OWN environmental impact studies to assess the safety of THEIR OWN genetically modified crop seeds.

It's like the agency is giving Monsanto the keys to USDA headquarters and saying, "Why don't you guys go ahead and regulate yourselves? And, as always, let us know if we can be of any help whatsoever!"

Meanwhile, for a glimpse at a genuine environmental disaster, just take a look at this to get an idea of how truly destructive the indiscriminate use of Roundup weed killer can be.

Think we'll see THAT in the results of Monsanto's impact study? Here's my guess: "NO WAY!"

Share/Save/BookmarkPrinter-friendly versionPrinter-friendly version

About the author

author-picture

Jenny Thompson is the Director of the Health Sciences Institute and editor of the HSI e-Alert. Through HSI, she and her team uncover important health information and expose ridiculous health misinformation, most notably through the HSI e-Alert.

Visit www.hsionline.com to sign up for the free HSI e-Alert.

OUTRAGE!! Billion-dollar drug company hides astounding discovery of a natural cancer killer.10,000 times stronger than chemo--but without the side effects!

Click here to read the full story of this astounding breakthrough…


Comments

Anonymous's picture
1

Dewey Fish

I guess we may as well bend over and kiss our arse's GoodBye...
The Government is So Corrupt and Our Elected Officaia are so Corrupt we will NEVER EVER GET A FARE SHAKE...
And we are FAR FAR to dumb to vote out all of the corupt Incumbent Poloiticians...
So The Only People we have to Blame is OURSELVES!
We Deserve to get it up the butt!
We May just as well Go Home and Shot the Grandkids in the Head! It is Better to kill them quickly rather than The Slow Death we have condemned them too...

Anonymous's picture
2

good ideas

There's a way to get Monsanto, "ON LINE" but I'm afraid that the majority of people that red this will agree, but... will say "I do not have the time" ... Let someone else do it... SO MONSANTO WILL WINN AGAIN.
BUT..
If you call your broker, bank investor counselor, or even "mutual found" and ORDER to get out of ANY KIND of investment that is connect with Monsanto or Aggregated corporations......
It may take couple of months... But... Just because of it the stock of Monsanto will go down.....
At the same time that you do that, write a note to Monsanto CO, and inform of your decisions.
Believe me, they will come to terms... when they see that the stock go down, they will be afraid of the "DOMINO EFFECT".
THEY WILL LOWER THE PANTS>>>>>
TKS FOR THE FEW THAT WILL FOLLOW MY SUGGESTION.
GL

Anonymous's picture
3

Anonymous

When growing up in the country, we either hand pulled the weeds such as cockle burr or by hand hoed the crops. Very few chemicals were used and good farming practices such as crop rotation were the norm.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <p> <strong> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <h2> <h3> <u> <em>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.


popitup