Hard Sell: Cancer and cell phones

Great news! There is no evidence linking cell phone use to brain tumor risk.

What a relief!

But...uh oh...that great news comes from the same people who brought you "Vioxx is safe," and "Keep using Avandia."

Yep--the FDA

So if the FDA is assuring us that cell phones don't cause brain tumors, my response is: "Gulp!"

At face value, the FDA report is actually reassuring.

It's based on a series of international studies called Interphone, coordinated by the World Health Organization. According to WHO officials, Interphone is the largest study to examine cell use and brain cancer, and includes the largest number of users with at least 10 years of radiofrequency exposure from cell phones.

And here's the FDA's quick summary of the results: "The study reported little or no risk of brain tumors for most long-term users of cell phones."

Okay...wait a second. The FDA spin doctors titled their press release "No Evidence Linking Cell Phone Use to Risk of Brain Tumors." But then they say there's "little or no risk."

So, which is it? Little risk, or no risk? And "for most long-term users"? That sounds to me like people ARE at risk if they can't pry the cell away from their ear. And I know LOTS of people like that. I'll bet you do too.

The FDA does this sort of thing all the time. When it comes to delivering news that might be unpleasant for giant corporations (such as Pfizer, or Lilly, or (in this case) Sprint, or ATT) they're as vague as a schoolboy who doesn't want to show his mother a bad report card.

Brain dangers

A New York Times article covered the same study and revealed some VERY important points missing from the FDA version.

For starters, Interphone subjects who used cell phones the most had a 40 percent higher risk of giloma, the same type of brain tumor that Senator Kennedy died from. But in FDA World, this is not "evidence" because it doesn't prove that cell use caused the tumors.

That's a pretty thin slice of comfort. And the comfort disappears completely when you hear from those who worked on Interphone.

The Times reports that several Interphone researchers told Microwave News that giloma risk among long-term users was larger toward the end of the study.

And Elisabeth Cardis--leader of the Interphone project-- said, "Overall, my opinion is that the results show a real effect."

Which is pretty much the EXACT OPPOSITE of the FDA press release title.

Hmmm...it's almost as if FDA officials WANTED to obscure the danger. Which would not be exactly shocking. After all, it is one of the things they do best.

One quick side note: The Times refers to the FDA as a "health group." As you can imagine, THAT had me laughing.

Drug industry shill--absolutely. Protector of the corporate status quo--without question. But a health group?

When flying pigs use cell phones.

Share/Save/BookmarkPrinter-friendly versionPrinter-friendly version

About the author

author-picture

Jenny Thompson is the Director of the Health Sciences Institute and editor of the HSI e-Alert. Through HSI, she and her team uncover important health information and expose ridiculous health misinformation, most notably through the HSI e-Alert.

Visit www.hsionline.com to sign up for the free HSI e-Alert.

OUTRAGE!! Billion-dollar drug company hides astounding discovery of a natural cancer killer.10,000 times stronger than chemo--but without the side effects!

Click here to read the full story of this astounding breakthrough…


Comments

Anonymous's picture
1

Tanya

The Environmental Working Group pretty much validates your fears. http://ewg.org/cellphone-radiation. Although quitting the cell phone will be much harder than quitting the microwave.

iPhone appears to be about halfway down, Blackberries further doomed. But I'd like to know from a cell phone geek whether I'm correct in hoping that "simpler" phones (with less connectivity) emit less radiation.

And I'd like to know from someone who truely understands the effects of radiation on tissue and organs: is it only bad when we talk on the phone or also when it's in pocket/purse or bedside table?

Thanks!

Anonymous's picture
2

Anonymous

glial cells are the white brain cells that support your neurons. Men have 5X the neurons of women and we ladies have 10 times as many glial cells as guys. No wonder we think they're aliens andvice versa!
cancer of glial cells is glioma gli- glial cell, -oma cancer

Dquixote1217's picture
3

Tony Isaacs

Right you are, Jenny. The study was heavily funded by industry and turned out to be a total whitewash job - which conradicted the lead and other study scientists as well as earlier reports from the study group saying that the results WOULD show a link between cell phones and cancer.

I have an article of my own about the whitewashed study which is currently in the hopper here and should be appearing soon (yeah, I'm one of your humble contributing writers) that may shed a bit of light on what happened.

Love your articles I get in my HSI emails!

Anonymous's picture
4

Anonymous

Check out info from BioPro, I think now called Gia Wellness. They have a lot of info on the dangers of cellphones and yes, they are harmful if on and in your pocket (hip/reproductive organ disease). More radiation pulses when call trying to connect so safe headsets a must - at least try to keep phone away from head while it's connecting. Penetrates child skull 4 inches!! There are products that help but.....stronger and stronger wireless will mean more and more unexplainable disease. Watch increases in brain tumors.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <p> <strong> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <h2> <h3> <u> <em>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.


popitup