Cervical Cancer Rates Could Be Cut in Half

If doctors can successfully treat a potentially fatal infection in the outback of India, they can surely treat it in Phoenix, Des Moines, Providence…just about anywhere.

And if they can treat this infection just about anywhere, then it's time to stop all this nonsense about the need for the dangerous HPV vaccine.

This is huge.

A research team led by France's International Agency for Research on Cancer recruited more than 130,000 middle-aged women in rural India.  The women were screened for HPV infection or given standard care, defined as education about HPV and recommendation for screening.

Results: Deaths in the standard care group were nearly TWICE AS HIGH as the number of deaths in the HPV-screening group when treatment for lesions was immediately given, when possible.

These on-the-spot treatment options included cryotherapy (cold treatment), loop electrosurgical excision procedure (in which radio frequency current is used to remove lesions), and conization (a biopsy procedure that can be used for immediate treatment – and the one that my doctor used when I was diagnosed).

Bottom line: Test for HPV, then immediately treat HPV, and cervical cancer rates could be cut in half.

Zero risk

"The implications of the findings of this trial are immediate and global: international experts in cervical- cancer prevention should now adapt HPV testing for widespread implementation."

Couldn't have said it better myself.

That quote comes from an editorial that accompanied the Indian study, both of which appeared in a recent issue of the New England Journal of Medicine.

The authors of the editorial actually support the use of Gardasil. Nevertheless, they offer this surprising (and less than glowing) commentary: "Even when HPV vaccines are affordable and widely used, they will not substantially decrease rates of cervical cancer for decades because of the long latency between infection and cancer. As the Indian trial shows, screening for HPV can lower the rate of death from cervical cancer within 5 to 10 years."

Unfortunately, the authors don't note the fact that IF Gardasil becomes widely used, there's no guarantee that cervical cancer rates will "substantially decrease."

Meanwhile, HPV screening and treatment works. It saves lives without putting lives at risk.

More than 30 deaths have already been linked to Gardasil use.

This might be the perfect textbook example of a no-brainer.

Reality awareness

April happens to be STD Awareness Month, which makes this a perfect time to get the word out about the reality of HPV and cervical cancer prevention.

And in case you missed it, I hope you'll take a moment to look at a recent video I made to help raise awareness of just how unnecessary the Gardasil vaccine actually is.

Please forward this e-Alert to friends and family members who have young daughters – the prime targets for Gardasil marketing.

Share/Save/BookmarkPrinter-friendly versionPrinter-friendly version

About the author

author-picture

Jenny Thompson is the Director of the Health Sciences Institute and editor of the HSI e-Alert. Through HSI, she and her team uncover important health information and expose ridiculous health misinformation, most notably through the HSI e-Alert.

Visit www.hsionline.com to sign up for the free HSI e-Alert.

OUTRAGE!! Billion-dollar drug company hides astounding discovery of a natural cancer killer.10,000 times stronger than chemo--but without the side effects!

Click here to read the full story of this astounding breakthrough…


Comments

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <p> <strong> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <h2> <h3> <u> <em>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.


popitup